‘Do It: the art of instructions’ – The Guardian article

Do It: the art of instructions

At Do It, visitors obey instructions left by artists from Ai Weiwei to Louise Bourgeois. Adrian Searle wrestles with a zip-up poncho and recreates his bedroom floor – but will he smile at a stranger?
Written by Adrian Searle
published 9th July 2013
The 20-year project … a Michael Craig-Martin picture by the entrance to John Chamberlain’s hardwood room of a certain size. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

So many things to do. Start a rumour; write a poem using toothpicks to form the letters; invite a stranger into your home for breakfast; use a bicycle seat to squeeze lemons; make Thai curry sauce; repent. There’s always time to repent. The list is endless, as is the Do It project, from which the above all come. Do It is an ever-growing compendium of commands and instructions now presented in a large, lively and thoughtful show at Manchester Art Gallery. These commands, by artists and for anyone to follow, invite us to join in the process of making, performing or completing an artist’s work. Exhibitions of Do It are great opportunities to have fun – and make an absolute spectacle of yourself.

Since 2007, the Manchester international festival has established a focus on live art, not just as spectacle, but also in terms of participation. It has, even more crucially, encouraged crossovers. Peter Sellars’s production of Shostakovich’s 1974 Suite on Verses from Michelangelo’s Sonnets (and a Bach cantata) featured the bass-baritone Eric Owens, who spent the performance dressed as a janitor mopping the stage, when he wasn’t simulating a heart attack. Wunderkind organist Cameron Carpenter was also involved, and the result, dynamic and intensely visual, was as much a piece of theatre as it was a concert. You could even say it was site-specific. I could have lived without the arty, back-projected images of the semi-naked and slightly tortured Owens though – a nod too far to Michelangelo. Not even a director of Sellars’s calibre always gets it right.

That work could almost exist as a Do It: watch a janitor mop the stage for a couple of hours as he sings a selection of Michelangelo’s sonnets, in Russian, in a derelict Methodist chapel. Who’d have thought it? But meanwhile, back at Do It, I am wrestling with a zip-up poncho that has been created in the form of a Möbius strip. I’ll try anything once. It’s a homage to Lygia Clark, the great Brazilian exponent of interactive art, and as I get myself in a bind with it a gaggle of children look on and laughed. I begin to wonder how far I am prepared to go with this audience-participation lark.

51C363B4-4782-4B25-8B50-7032A68955BF
Yoko Ono’s Wish Piece. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

Exhibitions of Do It have been on the road for 20 years now. Born out of a conversation in a Paris cafe in 1993, it’s the brainchild of French artists Christian Boltanski and Bertrand Lavier, as well as Swiss curator Hans Ulrich Obrist, one of the artistic advisers of MIF. Do It has had more than 60 incarnations: as exhibitions, archive, online video clips, seminars and peripatetic events on every continent. And all manner of artists – from Richard Hamilton to David Lynch, Elaine Sturtevant to Sarah Lucas – have offered instructions, as have critics, scientists and philosophers, not to mention choreographer William Forsythe and novelist Douglas Coupland. Do It is both populist and esoteric. Anyone can join in, and the instructions range from the daft to the dangerous, the unfulfillable to the apparently meaningless.

Ai Weiwei offers instructions on how to disable an overhead CCTV surveillance camera, using a can of spray paint (to squirt over the lens) attached to a long stick, operated using a corkscrew and a length of wire. He gives full instructions about how to build the device. Every home should have one! An unsmiling uniformed guard stands in front of a door. You can only enter if you are humming a tune as you approach. This is Adrian Piper’s 2012 Humming Room and, once inside the empty room, there’s nothing to do but carry on humming. Louise Bourgeois instructs us to stop and smile at a stranger when we are out walking, though I am unsure how much cheery bonhomie Bourgeois ever indulged in herself. Tracey Emin asks us, following Bourgeois, to hand a stranger a note that shrieks, among other things: “You Don’t Give Me The Love That I Need.” That’ll make them run.

Yoko Ono asks us to write down our wishes on little tags and attach them to her Wish Tree. Between the little wishes for world peace and someone hoping their mum’s leg might get better, there was a heartfelt wish that “curators would stop recycling the Wishing Tree – it’s been done to death”. I heartily agree. I rather hoped the vulture that had been allowed to fly in the gallery (a Do It by Colombian performance artist Maria José Arjona, made in homage to her compatriot María Teresa Hincapié, who turned her life into a continual performance) had landed on the tree and done some bad karma vulture wish-thing, but it didn’t.

A whole room is devoted to artists whose proposals have outlived them. US artist John Chamberlain stipulated a room of a certain size (with hardwood floor) and clothing, bedding, rope and small lace doilies. You can do what you want with them. Children played, I threw a few clothes around, to emulate my bedroom floor, and veteran conceptual artist Lawrence Weinerarranged Chamberlain’s stuff according to some system all his own, using the doilies to spell out SOS in Morse code. I know how he felt.

Do It is an evolving repertoire of works by an ever-expanding roster of artists, filling several galleries of its own and insinuating instructions amid the permanent collection. At the very least, we can take away the ideas of Do It in our heads, though curmudgeonly types might want to follow the late American painter Leon Golub‘s typically exclamatory instruction: “Don’t Do It! Refuse!” But Do It does bring people together, and gets them talking and engaging.

The ramifications of various pieces spread beyond the confines of the gallery. Kids in the lobby were making a huge arte-povera papier-mache ball of newspapers, to be used as an accompaniment to a stroll in the street, according to an instruction by Michelangelo Pistoletto. It’s a good way of using up old copies of the Guardian. And remember, the more you read, the bigger the balls.

7E643DB9-EAEE-465B-8DEE-8954AA152044
Ai Weiwei’s demonstration of how to disable a security camera.

It took some kind of gall, too, to perform Chicago artist Theaster Gates‘s How to Catch the Holy Ghost or Get Arrested in a Shopping Mall, in Manchester’s Arndale Centre, where a young man intoned the phrase “Our souls refreshed”, over and over. My soul wasn’t. If you are going to perform anything, your heart and soul have to be in it, refreshed or not.

I overslept the dawn commencement of Indian artist Nikhil Chopra’s 65-hour continuous performance Coal on Cotton, in a specially constructed marquee on the empty, open site of the Whitworth Gallery’s new extension. On both my visits, about 18 hours apart, Chopra, his face whitened and wearing the Lancashire mill-worker’s garb of big boots and cloth cap, was drawing on the wall of the tent, where he was living, eating and sleeping over the weekend.

The charcoal drawing, based on a photograph of Manchester in the 1960s, hadn’t much progressed beyond a view of a bucolic, tree-clad hinterland, a city in the distance and a few billowing smokestack clouds that had begun to climb the roof of the cotton tent. A soporific audience sat about, snapping the artist while he worked. The tent, and Chopra’s clothes, came from the last of the Manchester cotton mills and from Mumbai. Rather than using coal to draw with, the fuel of the Industrial Revolution, Chopra had settled for art-store willow charcoal, which seemed a bit of a cheat. The drawing, I suppose, was meant to invoke a kind of reversal of the colonialist picturesque. None of it amounted to much, in my view. Maybe I missed something. One early-bird visitor found the artist eating a banana at dawn, and it was quite possible to watch him sleeping, should you wander in at dead of night.

Next weekend the ubiquitous Tino Sehgal will be performing his wonderful This Variation, the electrifying piece he devised for Documenta in Germany last year. In the earlier version, there was dancing in the dark, a cappella singing (from the gospels to Good Vibrations), and an enveloping, disorientating atmosphere. At Documenta, I could barely drag myself away. His new, much enlarged version will be rechoreographed and staged in Mayfield Depot, the same echoing, abandoned space behind Manchester Piccadilly station used by Adam Curtis and Massive Attack this weekend to similarly devastating effect.

You never know if you are witness or participant, spectator or performer in Sehgal’s works. We’re all actors, just as we are in Do It. Sehgal was in the last festival here, and it is the second outing for several other artists and performers. It is time for younger blood, fresh instructions.

 

sources: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/jul/09/do-it-manchester-festival

MA research

These are some of the MA options I have looked in to. I don’t know currently whether I will do a masters but it is definitely an option.

1BCE3654-1FAC-4773-99F1-BC932D897C7F

https://www.arts.ac.uk/subjects/fine-art/postgraduate?collection=ual-courses-meta-prod&query=!nullquery&start_rank=1&sort=relevance&f.Subject-test|subject=Fine%20art&f.Course%20level|level=Postgraduate&f.College|college=Camberwell%20College%20of%20Arts&f.College|college=Chelsea%20College%20of%20Arts

8F946C36-69BD-4E20-84CD-FB8D3E4E8ED0

https://www.arts.ac.uk/subjects/illustration/postgraduate/ma-illustration-camberwell

EEA1C49D-84CB-4313-BDF9-51B0C39D18EF

3FE2E683-80F5-41D5-82FE-10F70A3A20B1https://royaldrawingschool.org/courses/postgraduate/

Tate Modern – Franz West

I think the textures and colours West uses are visually dynamic and exciting. He shapes of his sculptures are interesting against the background of a gallery space and the sculpture skills outside are particularly effective against the shapes of buildings and trees. West’s sculptures were originally built to be interactive which I think is really intriguing – in inviting the viewer to climb, stand and sit on the work he questions the functionality of each sculpture.

imageimageimage

 

Materiality and Materialism

image

Salvador Dali:

Jasper Johns:

Eva Hesse:

sources: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/jasper-johns-1365

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/dali-lobster-telephone-t03257

Sculptures

https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-modern/exhibition/eva-hesse

 

Skills 3 – sculpture research

image

Richard Deacon

I think the way Deacon leaves the joins and fixtures exposed in his work is really interesting – he doesn’t shy away from allowing the viewer to see how the work was made and in doing so invites the viewer to interact with the work in a more personal way. I also think the spiralling shapes he uses in the works below are really energetic and flowing; they have a real sense of movement within them.

‘Deacon describes himself as a ‘fabricator’, emphasising the construction behind the finished object…Such transparency highlights the reactive nature of the process: it is part of a two-way conversation between artist and material that transforms the workaday into something metaphorical.’ – Lissson Gallery

source: https://www.lissongallery.com/artists/richard-deacon#slider-artist/image-3996

Georges Vantongerloo

I find Vantongerloo’s sculpture work is really exciting – his piece ‘A ray of light in a magnetic field’ has a real sense of energy about it as a result of the twisting shape and the use of glass. I used this idea of movement partly as inspiration for the work I did in the metal workshop.

I also think ‘Interrelation of Volumes’ is an interesting piece of work and it is partly behind my desire to create plaster casts out of my maze drawings.

Sources: https://krollermuller.nl/en/georges-vantongerloo-a-ray-of-light-in-a-magnetic-field

https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/georges-vantongerloo-2094

Simon Callery

I think the way Callery uses fabric in his work to create irregular shapes and patterns is visually dynamic and intriguing. In particular, I think the way he leaves the back of the canvas visible in ‘Auricle’ is exciting as it invites the viewer to interact with the piece beyond the outcome and see how the canvas was made.

sources: http://www.foldgallery.com/artist/simon-callery-2/

Bernar Venet

Venet’s ‘Four Indeterminate Lines’ was a large part of the inspiration behind the metal spirals I made in the first week of this workshop. I knew I wanted to make the spiral drawings into 3D but I wasn’t sure how until I saw this metal sculpture. I think the work is exciting and has a real sense of movement, despite being heavy steel, and I want to evoke this with my work.

‘The expressive aesthetic of Four Indeterminate Lines is a manifestation of the artist’s freehand battle (or collaboration) with this material. This process is perceptible in the sculpture’s energetic form, which suggests the improvised nature of a child’s  doodle’ – Cass Sculpture Foundation

Sources: http://www.sculpture.org.uk/artwork/four-indeterminate-lines

Oscar Tauzon

I think the regular shape Tauzon uses in this piece work together to create a really effective sense of pattern within the space. The frame interacts with the irregular shape of the room in a visually dynamic way and invites the viewer to almost become pat of the work by walking through it.

21A651F3-5C19-4B71-9AA5-4D292823F6F7

Sources: https://artmap.com/maccarone/exhibition/oscar-tuazon-2008

Group Exhibition

Exhibition statement and risk assessment: 

Please write a proposal for what you intend to install in the exhibition in April (maximum 200 words). For this, you must provide a brief description of the work including themes and materials/processes involved. We also want you to undertake a simple risk assessment. Please indicate any risks that you think the work may present and offer ways of eradicating or reducing this risk.

Please submit this statement and risk assessment along with all other work for assessment. Please also contact your tutor if you have any queries about installing your work.

Exhibition proposal:

I want to exhibit a serial piece of work exploring the idea of instructional and process art that I have been experimenting with in my practice. I have been playing around with composing sets of instructions made from individual actions written by different people and the work I want to exhibit is the realisation of one of these instructions. The work is a series of 4 A2 paintings, portraying each step of the instructions which I want to display alongside the paintings. I have used acrylic and watercolour to produce this abstract work on cartridge paper which I want to hang straight on the wall likely using blue tack or small pins. A large focus of my instructional art has surrounded the idea that despite having a list of instructions the work will come out differently every time which I think is clear in the work I intend on exhibiting. Displaying the instructions alongside the paintings will allow the audience both to literally see the process written down and bring up the question of whether the paintings or the instructions are the real art.

Potential risks (e.g. slip hazard):

The only potential risk I can see in my work is in the unlikely event that it falls of the wall it could create a potential tripping hazard.

Controls to mitigate risk (e.g. avoid using liquids in such a way as they are likely to spill):

I will ensure that each painting is securely fastened to the wall.

Installation:

0ED70B22-5727-4901-BCED-4D7E29E6691248498C85-4FDE-4A3B-88DF-2D1E6D654A36C73E6F03-6515-4D21-BBE9-255F0626028F97AEBEBC-4073-484A-9472-FCD370F92F02

Poster:

4F5C6D03-9CFB-4E1B-AF05-0D6A469AB5C7

My final outcome:

Plan for group presentation:

BCEE749D-0446-47E8-9940-B607C1A2C7CE

I missed the group presentation but I was going to talk about the time we spent before the install planning where’s things would go and discussing layout. We spent a lot of time moving things around and deliberating about which pieces would work together before deciding the locations and installing the work.

Individual presentation notes:

Introduce general theme/idea of practice

Playing around with process and action 

Experimenting with the relevance of outcome in abstract art

To me the making of abstract art is often far more interesting than the final outcome for E.g. Jackson pollock – I am more interested by videos of him making than the actual art. His work is energetic and dynamic but seeing the physicality involved in making them is much more attractive to me 

In my exploration I’ve experimented with lots of techniques and ways of documenting process – filming myself, photographing each stage, serial art etc 

This led me to discover sol Lewitt’s instructional wall drawings which are the main inspiration behind the piece in the show. Lewitt writes instructions to be carried out by drafters provoking ideas of delegation and chance which I find really interesting when thinking about the importance of outcome – in delegating Lewitt suggests that outcome isn’t that important 

When thinking about my piece I knew I wanted to use instructions but I had been writing my own so far which left me largely in control of the outcome as I would have a clear idea of what I wanted the drawing to look like when writing my instructions so I experimented with getting other people to carry out my instructions which produced interesting results but I also like the idea of getting people to write instructions for me and therefore eliminating any control I might have over what the content of the piece would be.

And that’s what this piece is 

To further give the work up to chance I had multiple people write single actions, materials scale etc and then created instructions like a lucky dip which is how I got the instructions for this piece 

I’ve documented the process of making this not only by having each stage as a separate painting but also by displaying the instructions alongside the work so that everyone can read them and know how I made the work 

 

Instructional Art

These instructions were created by mixing up single actions, materials and that I’d got other people to write for me. I found it really interesting playing around with the the idea of control vs chance in this way – in allowing others to dictate what I drew I couldn’t focus fully on the processs and not think about the outcome at all which I think has produced some exciting work.

IMG_9359IMG_9360IMG_9363IMG_9364IMG_9365IMG_9371

EA6AD9BA-D107-4AC3-9F3A-ABB9ADA6DD0B
Instructions created from individual actions written by different people

Lynda Benglis

Lynda Benglis creates sculptural work inspired by the likes of Jackson Pollock that features latex pours – 3D works that come off the wall and show the action required in making them. Some of the pieces sit on the floor in corners whilst others hang up walls sticking out into the gallery space. I think her work is really exciting and dynamic – the latex pours literally display the action required in making them.

‘The latter [‘Wing’], which looks like six feet of viscose material pouring from wall to floor, is particularly impressive in the way it seems to preserve surging, forceful action.’ – Phylis Braff, NY Times

sources: http://www.artnet.com/usernet/awc/awc_thumbnail.asp?aid=424383056&gid=424383056&works_of_art=1&cid=83079

https://www.mfa.org/collections/object/wing-549919

 

Experimenting with frames

I used my iPad to play around with different irregular frame shapes for some of my paintings – I wanted to experiment with using sharp lines and edges as a contrast to the abstract shapes used in the work. I think that some of these are really effective and provide an interesting contrast to the softer, more fluid paintings.